People v. Washington

246 A.D.2d 677, 666 N.Y.S.2d 958, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 570
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Washington. Read the opinion of the Court — 233 A.D.2d 684

Opinion

Appeal by [678]*678the defendant from two judgments of the County Court, Westchester County (Smith, J.), both rendered February 14, 1995, convicting him of robbery in the second degree under Indictment No. 93-01785, upon his plea of guilty, and burglary in the third degree under Indictment No. 94-00021, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

We have examined the record and find that the defendant’s pleas were knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily entered (see, e.g., People v Harris, 61 NY2d 9; People v Mills, 223 AD2d 562).

The defendant’s remaining contention is without merit. Miller, J. P., Ritter, Altman and Krausman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Washington, 246 A.D.2d 677, 666 N.Y.S.2d 958, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 570 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

246 A.D.2d 677 (People v. Washington) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Harris
459 N.E.2d 170 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
People v. Mills
223 A.D.2d 562 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)