People v. Washington

236 A.D.2d 493, 654 N.Y.S.2d 594, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1199
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Washington. Read the opinion of the Court — 196 A.D.2d 346

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from an amended judgment of the County Court, Orange County (Paño Z. Patsalos, J.), rendered November 11, 1995, revoking a sentence of probation previously imposed by the same court on August 1, 1991, upon a finding that he had violated a condition thereof, upon his admission, and imposing a sentence of imprisonment upon his previous conviction of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree.

Ordered that the amended judgment is affirmed.

The defendant admitted to the violation of probation, with the understanding that he would receive a sentence within a certain range. The sentence imposed was within that range. The defendant has no basis to now complain that the sentence was excessive (see, People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816). Mangano, P. J., Sullivan, Altman and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Washington, 236 A.D.2d 493, 654 N.Y.S.2d 594, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1199 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

236 A.D.2d 493 (People v. Washington) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Kazepis
101 A.D.2d 816 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)