Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/People v. Washington

People v. Washington

234 A.D.2d 403, 651 N.Y.S.2d 885, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12943
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Washington. Read the opinion of the Court — 196 A.D.2d 346 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 9, 1996·Published

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the County Court, Nassau County (Mackston, J.), imposed July 6, 1995, on the ground that the sentence is excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant waived his right to appeal as a part of a negotiated plea agreement (see, People v Callahan, 80 NY2d 273; People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1). Nevertheless, we have considered the defendant’s contention that the sentence imposed was excessive, and find it without merit (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). Mangano, P. J., Bracken, Miller and Copertino, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Washington, 234 A.D.2d 403, 651 N.Y.S.2d 885, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12943 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

234 A.D.2d 403 (People v. Washington) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Seaberg
541 N.E.2d 1022 (New York Court of Appeals, 1989)
People v. Callahan
80 N.Y.2d 273 (New York Court of Appeals, 1992)
People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)