People v. Warrick

287 A.D.2d 327, 731 N.Y.S.2d 374, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9615
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Warrick. Read the opinion of the Court — 261 A.D.2d 152

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Martin Rettinger, J., at jury trial; Arlene Silverman, J., at sentence), rendered January 5, 2000, convicting defendant of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of 5 to 10 years, unanimously modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, to the extent of reducing the sentence to a term of 4V2 to 9 years, and otherwise affirmed.

To the extent that the prosecutor may have improperly appealed to the jurors’ emotions, any prejudice was prevented by the court’s prompt and thorough curative instructions.

In light of defendant’s military record, we find the sentence excessive to the extent indicated.

We have considered and rejected defendant’s remaining claims, including those contained in his pro se supplemental brief. We note that since defendant was denied leave to appeal to this Court from the denial of his motion to vacate judgment made pursuant to CPL 440.10, that order is not before this Court (CPL 450.15 [1]; 460.15). Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Nardelli, Ellerin, Lerner and Saxe, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Warrick, 287 A.D.2d 327, 731 N.Y.S.2d 374, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9615 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

287 A.D.2d 327 (People v. Warrick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.