People v. Warren

15 A.D.3d 681, 789 N.Y.S.2d 920, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2038
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Warren. Read the opinion of the Court — 27 A.D.3d 496

Opinion

Appeals by the defendant from two judgments of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Ambrosio, J.), both rendered March 21, 2002, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree under indictment No. 1094/01 and gang assault in the first degree under indictment No. 2425/01, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631 [1976]; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606 [1979]).

The defendant has not raised any nonfrivolous issues in his supplemental pro se brief. Adams, J.E, Cozier, Ritter and Skelos, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Warren, 15 A.D.3d 681, 789 N.Y.S.2d 920, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2038 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

15 A.D.3d 681 (People v. Warren) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
People v. Gonzalez
393 N.E.2d 987 (New York Court of Appeals, 1979)
People v. Paige
54 A.D.2d 631 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)