People v. Warren
248 A.D.2d 959, 670 N.Y.S.2d 163, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2996
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Warren. Read the opinion of the Court — 280 A.D.2d 75 →
Opinion
—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant failed to preserve for our review his contention that the verdict convicting him, inter alia, of rape in the first degree (Penal Law § 130.35 [1]) is not supported by legally sufficient evidence (see, People v Gray, 86 NY2d 10, 19; People v Lawrence, 85 NY2d 1002, 1004-1005). Were we to review that contention, we would conclude that it lacks merit (see, People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Dadd, J. — Rape, 1st Degree.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Warren, 248 A.D.2d 959, 670 N.Y.S.2d 163, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2996 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).
248 A.D.2d 959 (People v. Warren) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Gray
652 N.E.2d 919 (New York Court of Appeals, 1995)
People v. Lawrence
654 N.E.2d 1211 (New York Court of Appeals, 1995)
People v. Bleakley
508 N.E.2d 672 (New York Court of Appeals, 1987)