People v. Warren

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Warren

65 A.D.2d 804, 410 N.Y.S.2d 543, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13682

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 20, 1978

StatusPublished

This text of 65 A.D.2d 804 (People v. Warren) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Warren, 65 A.D.2d 804, 410 N.Y.S.2d 543, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13682 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered November 17, 1977, convicting him of robbery in the first degree and burglary in the second degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgment affirmed. We have sent for and examined the minutes of the prior proceedings in which defendant pleaded guilty to attempted robbery in the third degree, and as a result of which he was sentenced as a second felony offender in this case. Those minutes conclusively refute the claim that he was not given the allocution required by Boykin v Alabama (395 US 238). The other contentions urged by defendant are entirely devoid of merit. Titone, J. P., Shapiro, Cohalan and Margett, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered November 17, 1977, convicting him of robbery in the first degree and burglary in the second degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgment affirmed. We have sent for and examined the minutes of the prior proceedings in which defendant pleaded guilty to attempted robbery in the third degree, and as a result of which he was sentenced as a second felony offender in this case. Those minutes conclusively refute the claim that he was not given the allocution required by Boykin v Alabama (395 US 238). The other contentions urged by defendant are entirely devoid of merit. Titone, J. P., Shapiro, Cohalan and Margett, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

65 A.D.2d 804, 410 N.Y.S.2d 543, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13682, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-warren-nyappdiv-1978.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack