People v. Warner

220 A.D. 782

This text of 220 A.D. 782 (People v. Warner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Warner, 220 A.D. 782 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1927).

Opinion

Order remitting forfeiture of bail bond and directing cancellation of judgment' entered thereon reversed upon the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. We are of opinion that the failure of the surety to produce its principal as its undertaking agreed to do, together with the surety’s omission to give any account as to his whereabouts, should have required a denial of this application. We do not agree with the contention of the respondent surety company that the facts alleged in the information fail to show the commission of a crime. Even 'if the information were subject to such criticism, we think the surety could not take advantage of that state of facts. Having given an undertaking to produce the principal, its duty was to produce him and not to rely upon any alleged infirmity in the information. (Pernetti v. People, 99 App. Div. 391, 392.) Kelly, P. J., Young, Kapper, Lazansky and Hagarty, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pernetti v. People
99 A.D. 391 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1904)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
220 A.D. 782, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-warner-nyappdiv-1927.