People v. Ware

234 A.D.2d 323, 650 N.Y.S.2d 1002, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12822
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Ware. Read the opinion of the Court — 245 A.D.2d 85

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County [324]*324(Ferdinand, J.), rendered December 12, 1994, convicting him of murder in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We find that the trial court’s failure to dismiss a sworn juror was not an improvident exercise of discretion where the juror was questioned by the court and she stated that she would be able to deliberate in an impartial manner (see, People v Graham, 117 AD2d 832, 834-835).

The challenged conduct by the prosecutor does not warrant reversal.

Finally, the defendant’s sentence was not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). Rosenblatt, J. P., Sullivan, Copertino and Joy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Ware, 234 A.D.2d 323, 650 N.Y.S.2d 1002, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12822 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

234 A.D.2d 323 (People v. Ware) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
People v. Graham
117 A.D.2d 832 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)