People v. Ware
This text of 29 A.D.2d 557 (People v. Ware) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered September 9, 1966 upon resentence, convicting him of assault in the third degree, upon a plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. Sentence had orginally been imposed on July 20,1964, but execution thereof had been suspended, with defendant placed on probation. The judgment of September 9,1966 vacated the suspension of execution upon a finding that defendant had violated his probation by having intercourse with a 17-year-old girl. Appeal dismissed. The propriety of the revocation of probation and subsequent imprisonment can be tested only by a habeas corpus proceeding and not by appeal from the 1966 judgment (People v. Gregory L. [Anonymous], 28 A D 2d 68). In any event, if we were to consider the merits, we would affirm the judgment. Implicit in every grant of probation is a requirement that defendant not commit another crime. Revocation of probation was proper in this ease because defendant admitted that he committed the crime of statutory rape during the period of probation. Beldock, P. J., Christ, Rabin, Benjamin and Munder, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
29 A.D.2d 557, 285 N.Y.S.2d 321, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2724, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-ware-nyappdiv-1967.