People v. Ward

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Ward

304 A.D.2d 485, 757 N.Y.S.2d 735, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4522

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 29, 2003

StatusPublished

This text of 304 A.D.2d 485 (People v. Ward) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Ward, 304 A.D.2d 485, 757 N.Y.S.2d 735, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4522 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles Solomon, J.), rendered October 5, 1999, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 3 to 6 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s suppression motion was properly denied without a hearing. Defendant’s conclusory allegations failed to address the highly specific factual information supplied by the People and did not raise a factual issue as to probable cause for his arrest (compare People v Gonzalez, 247 AD2d 328 [1998], with People v Lopez, 263 AD2d 434 [1999]). Concur — Buckley, P.J., Mazzarelli, Ellerin, Williams and Gonzalez, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles Solomon, J.), rendered October 5, 1999, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 3 to 6 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s suppression motion was properly denied without a hearing. Defendant’s conclusory allegations failed to address the highly specific factual information supplied by the People and did not raise a factual issue as to probable cause for his arrest (compare People v Gonzalez, 247 AD2d 328 [1998], with People v Lopez, 263 AD2d 434 [1999]). Concur — Buckley, P.J., Mazzarelli, Ellerin, Williams and Gonzalez, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

304 A.D.2d 485, 757 N.Y.S.2d 735, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4522, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-ward-nyappdiv-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack