People v. Warcup
This text of 285 A.D. 1077 (People v. Warcup) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal from a judgment of a City Magistrate sitting as a Court of Special Sessions of the City> yf blew Yoiji, Borough of Richmond, convicting [1078]*1078appellant of operating a motor vehicle without being duly licensed (Vehicle and Traffic Law, § 20, subd. 4, par. a). On this appeal appellant contends that the judgment should be reversed and a new trial ordered because of the failure of the court to inform appellant of his right to counsel. The District Attorney does not oppose. Judgment reversed and a new trial ordered. An examination of the record indicates that appellant was not informed of his right to counsel (Code Grim. Pro., § 188). Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Beldock, Murphy and Ughetta, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
285 A.D. 1077, 139 N.Y.S.2d 721, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6711, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-warcup-nyappdiv-1955.