People v. Warcup

285 A.D. 1077, 139 N.Y.S.2d 721, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6711
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 16, 1955·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of a City Magistrate sitting as a Court of Special Sessions of the City> yf blew Yoiji, Borough of Richmond, convicting [1078] appellant of operating a motor vehicle without being duly licensed (Vehicle and Traffic Law, § 20, subd. 4, par. a). On this appeal appellant contends that the judgment should be reversed and a new trial ordered because of the failure of the court to inform appellant of his right to counsel. The District Attorney does not oppose. Judgment reversed and a new trial ordered. An examination of the record indicates that appellant was not informed of his right to counsel (Code Grim. Pro., § 188). Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Beldock, Murphy and Ughetta, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Warcup, 285 A.D. 1077, 139 N.Y.S.2d 721, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6711 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1955).

285 A.D. 1077 (People v. Warcup) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Forbes
191 Misc. 2d 573 (White Plains City Court, 2002)