People v. Wanda L.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Wanda L.

144 A.D.2d 584, 534 N.Y.S.2d 226, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11937

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 21, 1988

StatusPublished

This text of 144 A.D.2d 584 (People v. Wanda L.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Wanda L., 144 A.D.2d 584, 534 N.Y.S.2d 226, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11937 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Meyerson, J.), rendered November 20, 1984, adjudicating her a youthful offender, upon a jury verdict convicting her of robbery in the second degree (two counts) and assault in the second degree (two counts), and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that the jury should have been charged that character evidence, "in and of itself’, could create a reasonable doubt is without merit (see, People v Aharonowicz, 71 NY2d 678).

We have examined the defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Bracken, J. P., Kunzeman, Weinstein and Kooper, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Meyerson, J.), rendered November 20, 1984, adjudicating her a youthful offender, upon a jury verdict convicting her of robbery in the second degree (two counts) and assault in the second degree (two counts), and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that the jury should have been charged that character evidence, "in and of itself’, could create a reasonable doubt is without merit (see, People v Aharonowicz, 71 NY2d 678).

We have examined the defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Bracken, J. P., Kunzeman, Weinstein and Kooper, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

144 A.D.2d 584, 534 N.Y.S.2d 226, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11937, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-wanda-l-nyappdiv-1988.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack