People v. Walton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Walton

207 A.D.2d 925, 616 N.Y.S.2d 261, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8834

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 15, 1994

StatusPublished

This text of 207 A.D.2d 925 (People v. Walton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Walton, 207 A.D.2d 925, 616 N.Y.S.2d 261, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8834 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Schenectady County (Harrigan, J.), rendered March 25, 1993, convicting defendant [926]*926upon his plea of guilty of the crime of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree.

While incarcerated awaiting trial on an unrelated crime, a sealed indictment was handed up against defendant charging him with, inter alia, three separate drug sales to undercover law enforcement personnel. Defendant ultimately pleaded guilty to one count of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree in satisfaction of this indictment. We have examined defendant’s numerous contentions on appeal, including his claims that the counts of the indictment should have been severed and that his constitutional and statutory rights to a speedy trial were abridged, and find them to be without merit.

Cardona, P. J., Mikoll, Crew III, Weiss and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Schenectady County (Harrigan, J.), rendered March 25, 1993, convicting defendant [926]*926upon his plea of guilty of the crime of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree.

While incarcerated awaiting trial on an unrelated crime, a sealed indictment was handed up against defendant charging him with, inter alia, three separate drug sales to undercover law enforcement personnel. Defendant ultimately pleaded guilty to one count of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree in satisfaction of this indictment. We have examined defendant’s numerous contentions on appeal, including his claims that the counts of the indictment should have been severed and that his constitutional and statutory rights to a speedy trial were abridged, and find them to be without merit.

Cardona, P. J., Mikoll, Crew III, Weiss and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

207 A.D.2d 925, 616 N.Y.S.2d 261, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8834, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-walton-nyappdiv-1994.