People v. Walters

276 A.D.2d 264, 714 N.Y.S.2d 202, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9877
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Walters. Read the opinion of the Court — 251 A.D.2d 433

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Nicholas Figueroa, J.), rendered March 11, 1998, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of burglary in the third degree, and sentencing him to a term of 3V2 to 7 years, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis upon which to disturb the jury’s déterminations concerning credibility.

The court’s Sandoval ruling, which permitted inquiry as to only a portion of defendant’s lengthy and largely theft-related record, balanced the appropriate factors and was a proper exercise of discretion (see, People v Walker, 83 NY2d 455, 458-459; People v Mattiace, 77 NY2d 269, 275-276; People v Pavao, 59 NY2d 282, 292). Concur — Williams, J. P., Tom, Ellerin, Rubin and Saxe, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Walters, 276 A.D.2d 264, 714 N.Y.S.2d 202, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9877 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

276 A.D.2d 264 (People v. Walters) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Walker
633 N.E.2d 472 (New York Court of Appeals, 1994)
People v. Pavao
451 N.E.2d 216 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
People v. Mattiace
568 N.E.2d 1189 (New York Court of Appeals, 1990)