People v. Walters
38 Mich. App. 267
Opinion
Defendant pleaded guilty to larceny in a building and appeals. A motion to affirm has been filed by the people.
Upon an examination of the briefs and record, it is manifest that the questions sought to be reviewed are so unsubstantial as [268] to need no argument or formal submission. See People v Godsey, 35 Mich App 399 (1971).
Motion to affirm granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Walters, 38 Mich. App. 267 (Mich. Ct. App. 1972).
38 Mich. App. 267 (People v. Walters) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Godsey
192 N.W.2d 674 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1971)