People v. Walters
38 Mich. App. 267
This text of 38 Mich. App. 267 (People v. Walters) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
People v. Walters, 38 Mich. App. 267 (Mich. Ct. App. 1972).
Opinion
Defendant pleaded guilty to larceny in a building and appeals. A motion to affirm has been filed by the people.
Upon an examination of the briefs and record, it is manifest that the questions sought to be reviewed are so unsubstantial as [268]*268to need no argument or formal submission. See People v Godsey, 35 Mich App 399 (1971).
Motion to affirm granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
People v. Godsey
192 N.W.2d 674 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1971)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
38 Mich. App. 267, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-walters-michctapp-1972.