People v. Walsh

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Walsh

58 A.D.3d 646, 869 N.Y.S.2d 910

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Walsh. Read the opinion of the Court — 35 A.D.3d 637 →

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 13, 2009·Published

Opinion

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated December 24, 2001 (People v Walsh, 289 AD2d 517 [2001]), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered August 3, 2000.

[647]*647Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel (see Jones v Barnes, 463 US 745 [1983]; People v Stultz, 2 NY3d 277 [2004]). Prudenti, EJ., Mastro, Santucci and Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated December 24, 2001 (People v Walsh, 289 AD2d 517 [2001]), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered August 3, 2000.

[647]*647Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel (see Jones v Barnes, 463 US 745 [1983]; People v Stultz, 2 NY3d 277 [2004]). Prudenti, EJ., Mastro, Santucci and Miller, JJ., concur.

People v. Walsh, 58 A.D.3d 646, 869 N.Y.S.2d 910 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

58 A.D.3d 646 (People v. Walsh) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related