People v. Walser

71 A.D.3d 706, 894 N.Y.S.2d 913
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 2, 2010
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 71 A.D.3d 706 (People v. Walser) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Walser, 71 A.D.3d 706, 894 N.Y.S.2d 913 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Konviser, J.), rendered June 20, 2008, convicting him of attempted murder in the second degree, assault in the first degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s claim that some of the prosecutor’s comments during summation were improper and deprived him of a fair trial is unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Valdes, 66 AD3d 925 [2009]; People v Lino, 65 AD3d 1263 [2009]; People v Rodari, 2 AD3d 756 [2003]). In any event, to the extent that any of the challenged comments were improper, they were not so egregious as to deprive the defendant of a fair trial (see People v Valerio, 70 AD3d 869 [2010]; People v Franklin, 64 AD3d 614 [2009]).

The defendant’s remaining contention is without merit. Mastro, J.P., Angiolillo, Balkin and Sgroi, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Garcia-Villegas
78 A.D.3d 727 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
71 A.D.3d 706, 894 N.Y.S.2d 913, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-walser-nyappdiv-2010.