People v. Wallington

California Court of Appeal

People v. Wallington

246 P. 815, 77 Cal. App. 366, 1926 Cal. App. LEXIS 289

California Court of Appeal·Decided April 7, 1926·No. Docket No. 1372.·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

THE COURT.

[1] It appears from the face of the application for a stay of execution of the judgment under section 1243 of the Penal Code that the appeal from the judgment is abortive and that the order made after judgment necessarily must be affirmed. The appeal from the judgment was not taken in time. (Pen. Code, sec. 1239; Starr v. Superior Court, 23 Cal.App. 670 [139 P. 241].) [2] The sufficiency of the indictment could not be questioned on the motion made in the lower court to set aside *Page 367 the judgment after it had become final. (People v. Mooney,178 Cal. 525 [174 P. 325]; People v. Reid, 195 Cal. 249 [36 A.L.R. 1345, 232 P. 457].)

The application for stay of execution is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THE COURT.

[1] It appears from the face of the application for a stay of execution of the judgment under section 1243 of the Penal Code that the appeal from the judgment is abortive and that the order made after judgment necessarily must be affirmed. The appeal from the judgment was not taken in time. (Pen. Code, sec. 1239; Starr v. Superior Court, 23 Cal.App. 670 [139 P. 241].) [2] The sufficiency of the indictment could not be questioned on the motion made in the lower court to set aside *Page 367 the judgment after it had become final. (People v. Mooney,178 Cal. 525 [174 P. 325]; People v. Reid, 195 Cal. 249 [36 A.L.R. 1345, 232 P. 457].)

The application for stay of execution is denied.

People v. Wallington, 246 P. 815, 77 Cal. App. 366, 1926 Cal. App. LEXIS 289 (Cal. Ct. App. 1926).

Pincite

246 P. 815 (People v. Wallington) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related