People v. Waller

2019 NY Slip Op 3090
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 24, 2019
DocketInd. No. 15-00201
StatusPublished

This text of 2019 NY Slip Op 3090 (People v. Waller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Waller, 2019 NY Slip Op 3090 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

People v Waller (2019 NY Slip Op 03090)
People v Waller
2019 NY Slip Op 03090
Decided on April 24, 2019
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on April 24, 2019 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
MARK C. DILLON, J.P.
JEFFREY A. COHEN
COLLEEN D. DUFFY
LINDA CHRISTOPHER, JJ.

2016-08680
(Ind. No. 15-00201)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Shakeel Q. Waller, appellant. Samuel S. Coe, New City, NY, for appellant.


David M. Hoovler, District Attorney, Middletown, NY (Robert H. Middlemiss of counsel), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (Edward T. McLoughlin, J.), rendered June 27, 2016, convicting him of robbery in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's contention that his attorney was ineffective is based, in part, on matter appearing on the record and, in part, on matter outside the record, and thus constitutes a "mixed claim" of ineffective assistance (People v Maxwell, 89 AD3d 1108, 1109; see People v Evans, 16 NY3d 571). Since the defendant's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel cannot be resolved without reference to matter outside the record, a CPL 440.10 proceeding is the appropriate forum for reviewing the contention in its entirety (see People v Holmes, 167 AD3d 1039; People v Hili, 158 AD3d 647, 648).

Accordingly, as the defendant raises no other issues, we affirm the judgment of conviction.

DILLON, J.P., COHEN, DUFFY and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Evans
949 N.E.2d 457 (New York Court of Appeals, 2011)
People v. Maxwell
89 A.D.3d 1108 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2019 NY Slip Op 3090, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-waller-nyappdiv-2019.