People v. Wallace

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 26, 2026
Docket339 KA 25-00512
StatusPublished

This text of People v. Wallace (People v. Wallace) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Wallace, (N.Y. Ct. App. 2026).

Opinion

People v Wallace - 2026 NY Slip Op 04070
skip to main content

It appears you are using Adblock. Please disable Adblock to best experience our website.

Law Reporting
Bureau
Thomas J.K. Smith, State Reporter

People v Wallace

2026 NY Slip Op 04070

June 26, 2026

Appellate Division, Fourth Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This decision is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

v

TERRY WALLACE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Supreme Court of the State of New York, Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

Decided on June 26, 2026

339 KA 25-00512

Present: Whalen, P.J., Curran, Ogden, Nowak, And Delconte, JJ.

JULIE CIANCA, PUBLIC DEFENDER, ROCHESTER (GUY A. TALIA OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

BRIAN P. GREEN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ROCHESTER (MERIDETH H. SMITH OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Appeal from an order of the Monroe County Court (Karen Bailey Turner, J.), dated September 12, 2024. The order denied the petition of defendant for modification of his risk level pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act.

[*1]

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously reversed in the exercise of discretion without costs, the petition is granted and defendant is determined to be a level one risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from an order that denied his pro se petition pursuant to Correction Law § 168-o (2) seeking a downward modification of his previously imposed classification as a level two risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (SORA).

A defendant subject to SORA requirements may petition "for an order modifying the level of notification. The petition shall set forth the level of notification sought, together with the reasons for seeking such determination. The sex offender shall bear the burden of proving the facts supporting the requested modification by clear and convincing evidence" (Correction Law § 168-o [2]; see People v Ross, 210 AD3d 1444, 1444 [4th Dept 2022], lv denied 39 NY3d 908 [2023]; People v Higgins, 55 AD3d 1303, 1303 [4th Dept 2008]). "[T]he relevant inquiry regarding Correction Law § 168-o (2) applications is whether conditions have changed subsequent to the initial risk level determination warranting a modification thereof" (People v Bentley, 186 AD3d 1135, 1136 [4th Dept 2020], lv denied 36 NY3d 903 [2020] [internal quotation marks omitted]).

Here, County Court did not abuse its discretion in denying the petition inasmuch as defendant failed to establish that he completed sex offender treatment and failed to update his annual photo (see People v Diaz, 242 AD3d 1567, 1568-1569 [4th Dept 2025]). Nonetheless, we reverse the order on appeal in the exercise of our discretion and grant the petition (see generally People v Van Leer, 239 AD3d 779, 781 [2d Dept 2025]). Defendant has not sexually reoffended since his underlying offense requiring registration, and we agree with the determination of the Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders that there is "no compelling reason that would further serve public safety for [defendant] to remain at a [l]evel [two classification inasmuch] as he has shown by his law-abiding behavior for several years that he is capable of leading a prosocial and stable lifestyle."

Defendant's remaining contention is academic in light of our determination.

Entered: June 26, 2026

Ann Dillon Flynn

Clerk of the Court

Court Decisions

All Court Decisions Official Reports Service Bound Volumes Decision Search

Resources

RSS Feeds Style Manual Citation Tools Opinion Formatting & Privacy Guidelines Opinion Selection Criteria Legal Research Portal Site Index

About

About the Law Reporting Bureau About our Operations Contact Us Twitter

Quick Contact Info

17 Lodge Street

Albany, NY 12207

Phone: (518) 453-6900

Links to or from other sites do not signify endorsement or relationship with them.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Bentley
2020 NY Slip Op 4717 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
People v. Wallace, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-wallace-nyappdiv-2026.