People v. Wallace

261 A.D.2d 492, 688 N.Y.S.2d 893, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4713
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Wallace. Read the opinion of the Court — 246 A.D.2d 676

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Cacciabaudo, J.), rendered August 20, 1996, convicting him of burglary in the first degree and sexual abuse in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of those branches of the defendant’s omnibus motion which were to suppress identification testimony and a statement he made to law enforcement officials.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions, including those [493]*493raised in his supplemental pro se brief, are without merit. Mangano, P. J., Santucci, Krausman and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Wallace, 261 A.D.2d 492, 688 N.Y.S.2d 893, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4713 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

261 A.D.2d 492 (People v. Wallace) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Contes
454 N.E.2d 932 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)