People v. Wallace

Illinois Supreme Court

People v. Wallace

570 N.E.2d 334, 143 Ill. 2d 59, 155 Ill. Dec. 821, 1991 Ill. LEXIS 21

CourtIllinois Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 28, 1991

Docket70005

StatusPublished

Cited by77 cases

This text of 570 N.E.2d 334 (People v. Wallace) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Wallace, 570 N.E.2d 334, 143 Ill. 2d 59, 155 Ill. Dec. 821, 1991 Ill. LEXIS 21 (Ill. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

JUSTICE HEIPLE

delivered the opinion of the court:

The issue presented in this case is whether a defendant who enters a plea of guilty and objects only to the sentence imposed must file a written motion to reconsider prior to filing a notice of appeal. We conclude that the filing of a motion to reconsider a sentence is a prerequisite to an appeal from that sentence.

Defendant, John Wallace, pleaded guilty to charges of armed robbery, attempted murder and intimidation and was subsequently sentenced.. Defendant did not file a written motion to withdraw his guilty plea or a motion to reconsider his sentence. Instead, he filed a notice of appeal, seeking review of his sentence only. The Appellate Court, Fifth District, citing People v. Wilk (1988), 124 Ill. 2d 93, dismissed defendant’s appeal for failure to file a motion to reconsider. We affirm.

Supreme Court Rule 604(d) (134 Ill. 2d R. 604(d)) outlines the procedure for an appeal by a defendant from a judgment entered upon a plea of guilty. The rule directs a defendant to file a motion to withdraw his plea of guilty and vacate the judgment before an appeal will be taken. Rule 604(d) was effectively broadened by this court’s decision in Wilk, which stated, in essence, that if the defendant is complaining only about his sentence, it is sufficient that he file a motion attacking only the sentence prior to appeal. The court stated that a motion to reconsider the sentence gives the trial court the necessary opportunity to review the appropriateness of the sentence imposed and correct any errors made. It is not necessary that a defendant ask for leave to withdraw the guilty plea itself. Wilk, 124 Ill. 2d at 110.

For the foregoing reasons, we affirm the appellate court’s dismissal of defendant’s appeal.

Affirmed.

JUSTICE CALVO took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

JUSTICE HEIPLE

delivered the opinion of the court:

The issue presented in this case is whether a defendant who enters a plea of guilty and objects only to the sentence imposed must file a written motion to reconsider prior to filing a notice of appeal. We conclude that the filing of a motion to reconsider a sentence is a prerequisite to an appeal from that sentence.

Defendant, John Wallace, pleaded guilty to charges of armed robbery, attempted murder and intimidation and was subsequently sentenced.. Defendant did not file a written motion to withdraw his guilty plea or a motion to reconsider his sentence. Instead, he filed a notice of appeal, seeking review of his sentence only. The Appellate Court, Fifth District, citing People v. Wilk (1988), 124 Ill. 2d 93, dismissed defendant’s appeal for failure to file a motion to reconsider. We affirm.

Supreme Court Rule 604(d) (134 Ill. 2d R. 604(d)) outlines the procedure for an appeal by a defendant from a judgment entered upon a plea of guilty. The rule directs a defendant to file a motion to withdraw his plea of guilty and vacate the judgment before an appeal will be taken. Rule 604(d) was effectively broadened by this court’s decision in Wilk, which stated, in essence, that if the defendant is complaining only about his sentence, it is sufficient that he file a motion attacking only the sentence prior to appeal. The court stated that a motion to reconsider the sentence gives the trial court the necessary opportunity to review the appropriateness of the sentence imposed and correct any errors made. It is not necessary that a defendant ask for leave to withdraw the guilty plea itself. Wilk, 124 Ill. 2d at 110.

For the foregoing reasons, we affirm the appellate court’s dismissal of defendant’s appeal.

Affirmed.

JUSTICE CALVO took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

570 N.E.2d 334, 143 Ill. 2d 59, 155 Ill. Dec. 821, 1991 Ill. LEXIS 21, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-wallace-ill-1991.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack