People v. Walker

2020 NY Slip Op 624, 114 N.Y.S.3d 714, 179 A.D.3d 1103
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 29, 2020
DocketInd. No. 10358/01
StatusPublished

This text of 2020 NY Slip Op 624 (People v. Walker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Walker, 2020 NY Slip Op 624, 114 N.Y.S.3d 714, 179 A.D.3d 1103 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2020).

Opinion

People v Walker (2020 NY Slip Op 00624)
People v Walker
2020 NY Slip Op 00624
Decided on January 29, 2020
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on January 29, 2020 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
REINALDO E. RIVERA, J.P.
JOSEPH J. MALTESE
BETSY BARROS
VALERIE BRATHWAITE NELSON
ANGELA G. IANNACCI, JJ.

2014-09676
(Ind. No. 10358/01)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Eric Walker, appellant. Paul Skip Laisure, New York, NY (Melissa S. Horlick of counsel), for appellant.


Melinda Katz, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, NY (John M. Castellano and Johnnette Traill of counsel; Deanna Russo on the brief), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Stephen A. Knopf, J.), dated October 10, 2014, as, upon renewal, denied his motion to be resentenced pursuant to CPL 440.46 on his conviction of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, which sentence was originally imposed, upon his plea of guilty, on June 25, 2003. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with Anders v California (386 US 738), in which he moves for leave to withdraw as counsel for the appellant.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from.

We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by the defendant's assigned counsel pursuant to Anders v California (386 US 738), and, upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is, therefore, granted (see id.; Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.], 89 AD3d 252; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606).

RIVERA, J.P., MALTESE, BARROS, BRATHWAITE NELSON and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
People v. Gonzalez
393 N.E.2d 987 (New York Court of Appeals, 1979)
People v. Paige
54 A.D.2d 631 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)
In re Giovanni S.
89 A.D.3d 252 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2020 NY Slip Op 624, 114 N.Y.S.3d 714, 179 A.D.3d 1103, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-walker-nyappdiv-2020.