People v. Walker

77 A.D.3d 450, 908 N.Y.S.2d 572
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Walker. Read the opinion of the Court — 50 A.D.3d 1452

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (A. Kirke Bartley, J.), entered on or about April 10, 2007, which adjudicated defendant a level three sex offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court properly assessed 10 points for defendant’s failure to accept responsibility for his sex offense. The circumstances of defendant’s plea and sentencing, viewed as a whole, do not demonstrate a genuine acceptance of responsibility (see People v Marinconz, 178 Misc 2d 30, 34-35 [Sup Ct, Bronx County 1998]). The record also supports the court’s conclusion that a discretionary upward departure would have been appropriate in any event. Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Sweeny, Moskowitz, Acosta and Román, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Walker, 77 A.D.3d 450, 908 N.Y.S.2d 572 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2010).

77 A.D.3d 450 (People v. Walker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Marinconz
178 Misc. 2d 30 (New York Supreme Court, 1998)