People v. Walker

56 A.D.2d 1222, 866 N.Y.S.2d 901
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Walker. Read the opinion of the Court — 27 A.D.3d 899

Opinion

— Appeal from a judgment of the Erie County Court (Timothy J. Drury, J.), rendered May 24, 2006. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree (Penal Law § 220.16 [12]), defendant contends that County Court abused its discretion in failing to grant a hearing on his motion to withdraw his guilty plea. We reject that contention because defendant’s motion was based on a charge from a separate indictment pending before a different judge. The sentence is not unduly harsh or severe. Present— Scudder, PJ, Martoche, Centra, Lunn and Gorski, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Walker, 56 A.D.2d 1222, 866 N.Y.S.2d 901 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

56 A.D.2d 1222 (People v. Walker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 220.16
New York PEN § 220.16