People v. Walker

201 A.D.2d 896, 607 N.Y.S.2d 815, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2065
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Walker. Read the opinion of the Court — 175 A.D.2d 146

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We affirm the suppression court’s determination for reasons stated in the decision at Erie County Court (Drury, J.). We reject defendant’s argument that the District Attorney’s policy of requiring a waiver of appeal as a condition of offering a plea to a lesser charge is illegal and unconstitutional (see, People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1). Fi[897]*897nally, we decline to modify defendant’s sentence in the interest of justice. (Appeal from Judgment of Erie County Court, Drury, J. — Criminal Possession Weapon, 3rd Degree.) Present —Green, J. P., Pine, Lawton, Doerr and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Walker, 201 A.D.2d 896, 607 N.Y.S.2d 815, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2065 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

201 A.D.2d 896 (People v. Walker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Seaberg
541 N.E.2d 1022 (New York Court of Appeals, 1989)