People v. Waldorf System Inc.

257 A.D. 626, 15 N.Y.S.2d 53, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7829
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 27, 1939
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 257 A.D. 626 (People v. Waldorf System Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Waldorf System Inc., 257 A.D. 626, 15 N.Y.S.2d 53, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7829 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The evidence failed to establish that the defendant’s possession of the impure food was for the purpose of sale in that condition, in violation of section 163 of the Sanitary Code. (People v. Woolworth Co., 250 App. Div. 864; People v. Woolworth Co., 246 id. 838.) Possession, without intent to sell, is not included in the ordinance. (People v. Timmerman, 79 App. Div. 565; affd., 179 N. Y. 550.) In the present case any presumption of intent to sell arising from the possession of the impure food (Sanitary Code, art. 9, § 138*), was successfully repelled by the defendant’s proof.

The judgment should be reversed and the information dismissed.

Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Townley, Glennon and , Untermyer, JJ.

Judgment unanimously reversed and the information dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Philip Lewis Egg Products, Inc.
197 Misc. 212 (New York City Magistrates' Court, 1949)
People v. Hygrade Food Products Corp.
269 A.D. 826 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1945)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
257 A.D. 626, 15 N.Y.S.2d 53, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7829, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-waldorf-system-inc-nyappdiv-1939.