People v. Walden

92 A.D.3d 462, 937 N.Y.2d 849

This text of 92 A.D.3d 462 (People v. Walden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Walden, 92 A.D.3d 462, 937 N.Y.2d 849 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

The court erred in initially designating defendant a level three offender rather than a level two offender. The record at best, only supports the level two classification. We exercise our independent discretion to grant defendant a downward departure to level one (see People v Johnson, 11 NY3d 416, 421 [2008]). Concur — Saxe, J.P., Friedman, Catterson, Freedman and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Johnson
900 N.E.2d 930 (New York Court of Appeals, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
92 A.D.3d 462, 937 N.Y.2d 849, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-walden-nyappdiv-2012.