People v. Walden

256 A.D.2d 1183, 682 N.Y.S.2d 362, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14328

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant was given a meaningful opportunity at sentencing to move to withdraw his plea of guilty (see, People v Chandler, 214 AD2d 1027, 1028, lv denied 86 NY2d 792). Because he failed to make such a motion or to make a postverdict motion to vacate the judgment of conviction, his contention that County Court erred in not allowing him to withdraw his plea is not preserved for our review (see, People v Stedge, 250 AD2d 880). Defendant’s “unrestricted waiver of the right to appeal * * * encompassed [the] right to review of the sentence as harsh and excessive” (People v Hidalgo, 91 NY2d 733, 734). (Appeal from Judgment of Erie County Court, DiTullio, J. — Assault, 2nd Degree.) Present— Pine, J. P., Hayes, Wisner, Pigott, Jr., and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Walden, 256 A.D.2d 1183, 682 N.Y.S.2d 362, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14328 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

256 A.D.2d 1183 (People v. Walden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Hidalgo
698 N.E.2d 46 (New York Court of Appeals, 1998)
People v. Chandler
214 A.D.2d 1027 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
People v. Stedge
250 A.D.2d 880 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)