People v. Walborn

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Walborn

25 A.D.2d 794, 269 N.Y.S.2d 384, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4386

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 29, 1966

StatusPublished

This text of 25 A.D.2d 794 (People v. Walborn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Walborn, 25 A.D.2d 794, 269 N.Y.S.2d 384, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4386 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

Memorandum by the Court. Defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction of the County Court of Chemung County entered upon his plea of guilty to the second count of an indictment charging him with the crime of malicious damage to an automobile in violation of subdivision 11-a of section 1425 of the Penal Law. We find no substance in his contentions that the court was without jurisdiction to accept the plea of guilty, that he was deprived of his right to speak for himself after the allocution called for by section 480 of the Code of Criminal Procedure had been pronounced or that defendant’s negative response to the court’s inquiry was made under any misunderstanding of his rights. Judgment affirmed.

Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Taylor and Aulisi, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Memorandum by the Court. Defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction of the County Court of Chemung County entered upon his plea of guilty to the second count of an indictment charging him with the crime of malicious damage to an automobile in violation of subdivision 11-a of section 1425 of the Penal Law. We find no substance in his contentions that the court was without jurisdiction to accept the plea of guilty, that he was deprived of his right to speak for himself after the allocution called for by section 480 of the Code of Criminal Procedure had been pronounced or that defendant’s negative response to the court’s inquiry was made under any misunderstanding of his rights. Judgment affirmed.

Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Taylor and Aulisi, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

25 A.D.2d 794, 269 N.Y.S.2d 384, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4386, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-walborn-nyappdiv-1966.