People v. Waiters

2024 NY Slip Op 06365
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 18, 2024
DocketInd. No. 528/20
StatusPublished

This text of 2024 NY Slip Op 06365 (People v. Waiters) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Waiters, 2024 NY Slip Op 06365 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2024).

Opinion

People v Waiters (2024 NY Slip Op 06365)
People v Waiters
2024 NY Slip Op 06365
Decided on December 18, 2024
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on December 18, 2024 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
MARK C. DILLON, J.P.
CHERYL E. CHAMBERS
BARRY E. WARHIT
LOURDES M. VENTURA, JJ.

2023-00189
(Ind. No. 528/20)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Nicole Waiters, appellant.


Patricia Pazner, New York, NY (Denise A. Corsi of counsel), for appellant.

Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Leonard Joblove and Marie John of counsel; Rebecca Siegel on the memorandum), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by her motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Abena Darkeh, J.), imposed December 14, 2022, upon her plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the record demonstrates that she knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived her right to appeal (see People v Thomas, 34 NY3d 545, 558-564; People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 255-257; People v Cabral, 223 AD3d 839, 839). The defendant's valid waiver of her right to appeal precludes appellate review of her contention that the sentence imposed was excessive (see People v Cabral, 223 AD3d at 839; People v Stevens, 203 AD3d 958, 959-960).

DILLON, J.P., CHAMBERS, WARHIT and VENTURA, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Darrell M. Joseph

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Lopez
844 N.E.2d 1145 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)
People v. Stevens
203 A.D.3d 958 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)
People v. Constantine
201 N.Y.S.3d 682 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2024)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2024 NY Slip Op 06365, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-waiters-nyappdiv-2024.