People v. Wade

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Wade

26 A.D.2d 795, 274 N.Y.S.2d 993, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3491

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 22, 1966

StatusPublished

This text of 26 A.D.2d 795 (People v. Wade) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Wade, 26 A.D.2d 795, 274 N.Y.S.2d 993, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3491 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

Orders unanimously reversed and matter remitted to Erie County Supreme Court for a hearing in accordance with the Memorandum. Memorandum: The petitioner alleges that his adjudication as a probation violator and the sentence imposed on such adjudication November 15, 1950 is void in that he was not represented by counsel or advised of his right to counsel. He further asserts that service of such sentence delayed the commencement of the term of imprisonment he is now serving on a subsequent conviction. Such allegations entitle him to a hearing and an opportunity to present evidentiary support for his contentions. (See People v. Hamilton, 26 A D 2d 134.) (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Erie County, denying, without a hearing, motion to vacate a judgment of conviction for forgery, second degree, rendered June 30, 1950; also appeal from order denying motion for same relief following renewal of prior application.) Present — Williams, P. J., Goldman, Henry, Del Vecchio and Marsh, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Orders unanimously reversed and matter remitted to Erie County Supreme Court for a hearing in accordance with the Memorandum. Memorandum: The petitioner alleges that his adjudication as a probation violator and the sentence imposed on such adjudication November 15, 1950 is void in that he was not represented by counsel or advised of his right to counsel. He further asserts that service of such sentence delayed the commencement of the term of imprisonment he is now serving on a subsequent conviction. Such allegations entitle him to a hearing and an opportunity to present evidentiary support for his contentions. (See People v. Hamilton, 26 A D 2d 134.) (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Erie County, denying, without a hearing, motion to vacate a judgment of conviction for forgery, second degree, rendered June 30, 1950; also appeal from order denying motion for same relief following renewal of prior application.) Present — Williams, P. J., Goldman, Henry, Del Vecchio and Marsh, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

26 A.D.2d 795, 274 N.Y.S.2d 993, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3491, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-wade-nyappdiv-1966.