People v. Volpe
This text of 46 Misc. 2d 958 (People v. Volpe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Since the judgment found the defendant guilty of petit larceny (1st count) and of criminally concealing and withholding stolen and wrongfully acquired property, as a misdemeanor, (3d count), the same property set forth in the first count, it is contrary to law. The defendant was sentenced to [959]*959six months on both counts, execution of the sentence being suspended. Where the property withheld is the same property the defendant is alleged to have stolen, the defendant may be convicted of either larceny or concealing and withholding, but not both. The action of concealing and withholding is but a continuation of the larceny itself. (People v. Daghita, 301 N. Y. 223.)
The judgment of conviction should be modified on the law to the extent of reversing the conviction for criminally concealing and withholding stolen property, as a misdemeanor, and of dismissing that count of the information, and, as so modified, the judgment of conviction should be affirmed.
Concur — Gold, J. P., Tilzer and Hofstadter, JJ.
Judgment modified, etc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
46 Misc. 2d 958, 260 N.Y.S.2d 578, 1965 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1952, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-volpe-nyappterm-1965.