People v. Vogt

235 A.D. 706

This text of 235 A.D. 706 (People v. Vogt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Vogt, 235 A.D. 706 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1932).

Opinion

Judgment of conviction by a city magistrate, sitting as a Court of Special Sessions, affirmed. We are constrained to affirm because the trial judge had the advantage of seeing these witnesses, although we deem the punishment too severe, particularly because of the mandatory requirement that defendant’s license be revoked in the event of a conviction for this offense, and because the burden of such revocation may not be lifted for at least six months under the statute,* upon an application to the Commissioner of Motor Vehicles. Lazansky, P. J., Carswell and Davis, JJ., concur; Hagarty and Seudder, JJ., dissent and vote to reverse and to dismiss the information.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
235 A.D. 706, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-vogt-nyappdiv-1932.