People v. Vives

57 A.D.3d 312, 872 N.Y.2d 1
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 16, 2008·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

[313] The record supports the court’s discretionary upward departure to a level three sex offender adjudication. There was ample evidence to support aggravating factors not adequately accounted for in the risk assessment instrument (see e.g. People v O’Flaherty, 23 AD3d 237 [2005], lv denied 6 NY3d 705 [2006]), and there was no improper double counting. These aggravating factors demonstrated that defendant is a dangerous pedophile with a grave risk of reoffending, notwithstanding his conclusory claims of having been rehabilitated during his incarceration. Concur—Andrias, J.P., Nardelli, Sweeny, DeGrasse and Freedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Vives, 57 A.D.3d 312, 872 N.Y.2d 1 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

57 A.D.3d 312 (People v. Vives) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Cox
2019 NY Slip Op 4428 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)
People v. Smith
2018 NY Slip Op 856 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
People v. Bernstein
2017 NY Slip Op 8615 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
People v. Lyons
72 A.D.3d 776 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)