People v. Vitti

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Vitti

121 A.D.2d 664, 503 N.Y.S.2d 1009, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 58654

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 23, 1986

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 121 A.D.2d 664 (People v. Vitti) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Vitti, 121 A.D.2d 664, 503 N.Y.S.2d 1009, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 58654 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Greenberg, J.), rendered March 4, 1985, convicting him of criminal possession of stolen property in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Judgment reversed, on the law, indictment dismissed and matter remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for the purpose of entering an order in its discretion pursuant to CPL 160.50.

Inasmuch as the statutory authority pursuant to which the police officers acted in searching the defendant’s premises (see, Vehicle and Traffic Law § 415-a [5] [a]; NY City Charter § 436) has now been held to be an unconstitutional infringement upon the right to be protected against unreasonable searches and seizures (see, People v Burger, 67 NY2d 338), the defendant’s conviction, based on his possession of stolen automobile parts, can no longer stand.

We therefore need not address the merits of the other issues raised by the defendant. Thompson, J. P., Bracken, Rubin and Eiber, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Greenberg, J.), rendered March 4, 1985, convicting him of criminal possession of stolen property in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Judgment reversed, on the law, indictment dismissed and matter remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for the purpose of entering an order in its discretion pursuant to CPL 160.50.

Inasmuch as the statutory authority pursuant to which the police officers acted in searching the defendant’s premises (see, Vehicle and Traffic Law § 415-a [5] [a]; NY City Charter § 436) has now been held to be an unconstitutional infringement upon the right to be protected against unreasonable searches and seizures (see, People v Burger, 67 NY2d 338), the defendant’s conviction, based on his possession of stolen automobile parts, can no longer stand.

We therefore need not address the merits of the other issues raised by the defendant. Thompson, J. P., Bracken, Rubin and Eiber, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

121 A.D.2d 664, 503 N.Y.S.2d 1009, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 58654, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-vitti-nyappdiv-1986.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack