People v. Virviescas

240 A.D.2d 520, 659 N.Y.S.2d 767, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6065

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Cooperman, J.), rendered September 11, 1995, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree (two counts), upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Appellate review of the issues raised by the defendant was effectively waived by him as part of his plea agreement (see, People v Holman, 89 NY2d 876; People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1; [521]*521People v Miller, 238 AD2d 358). Mangano, P. J., O’Brien, Ritter and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Virviescas, 240 A.D.2d 520, 659 N.Y.S.2d 767, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6065 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

240 A.D.2d 520 (People v. Virviescas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Holman
675 N.E.2d 847 (New York Court of Appeals, 1996)
People v. Seaberg
541 N.E.2d 1022 (New York Court of Appeals, 1989)
People v. Miller
238 A.D.2d 358 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)