People v. Virola

203 A.D.2d 164, 610 N.Y.S.2d 788, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4096
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 21, 1994·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (George Roberts, J.), rendered May 5, 1992, convicting defendant, upon her plea of guilty, of grand larceny in the third degree, and sentencing her to five years probation, ordering restitution and directing her to execute a confession of judgment in the amount of $16,420 unanimously modified, on the law and the facts, to the extent of vacating the direction that defendant make restitution, and as so modified, affirmed.

The plea minutes disclose that in return for the entry of a guilty plea to the top count of the indictment and execution of a confession of judgment in the amount of $16,420, the court promised to sentence defendant to five years probation. At sentencing, the court was under the mistaken belief that restitution was part of the plea bargain, which belief was not corrected by the prosecutor. As the People concede, since the sentence imposed did not conform to the terms of the plea [165]*165bargain, the portion of defendant’s sentence directing restitution must be vacated (People v Allen, 170 AD2d 686; see, People v Bright, 194 AD2d 479). However, the confession of judgment remains. Concur — Carro, J. P., Kupferman, Asch, Nardelli and Williams, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Virola, 203 A.D.2d 164, 610 N.Y.S.2d 788, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4096 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

203 A.D.2d 164 (People v. Virola) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Nash
48 A.D.3d 705 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
People v. Flecha
283 A.D.2d 1023 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
People v. Masten
215 A.D.2d 892 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)