People v. Vincent

48 A.D.3d 835, 851 N.Y.S.2d 361
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 26, 2008
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 48 A.D.3d 835 (People v. Vincent) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Vincent, 48 A.D.3d 835, 851 N.Y.S.2d 361 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Guzman, J.), rendered July 8, 2004, convicting him of burglary in the third degree, petit larceny, and criminal mischief in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The Supreme Court properly denied, without a hearing, the defendant’s motion to set aside the verdict pursuant to CPL 330.30 (2), based upon comments a juror allegedly made to defense counsel after the verdict was rendered (see People v Bab Lin You, 264 AD2d 780 [1999]; People v Cervantes, 242 AD2d 730, 731 [1997]). Skelos, J.P., Fisher, Dillon and McCarthy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Samandarov
56 A.D.2d 575 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
48 A.D.3d 835, 851 N.Y.S.2d 361, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-vincent-nyappdiv-2008.