People v. Vincent

California Court of Appeal

People v. Vincent

32 P.2d 436, 138 Cal. App. 775, 1934 Cal. App. LEXIS 885

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedMay 1, 1934

DocketCrim. No. 1791

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 32 P.2d 436 (People v. Vincent) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Vincent, 32 P.2d 436, 138 Cal. App. 775, 1934 Cal. App. LEXIS 885 (Cal. Ct. App. 1934).

Pincite

Opinion

SPENCE, J.

This is a companion case to People v. Richardson, Criminal number 1790, the opinion in which last-named case has been this day filed (ante, p. 404 [32 Pac. (2d) 433]). Defendant here was likewise a prisoner committed to the state prison at San Quentin. He made his escape from the road camp in Butte County and was subsequently apprehended at Salt Lake City. He was extradited and was returned to the prison at San Quentin. Thereafter he was tried and convicted in the Superior Court of Marin County on the charge of escape and from the final judgment of conviction he appeals.

While separate briefs have been filed herein, said briefs are almost identical with the briefs filed in the Richardson case. No new points are raised. For the reasons set forth in the opinion of People v. Richardson, Criminal number 1790, the judgment herein is affirmed.

Nourse, P. J., and Sturtevant, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SPENCE, J.

This is a companion case to People v. Richardson, Criminal number 1790, the opinion in which last-named case has been this day filed (ante, p. 404 [32 Pac. (2d) 433]). Defendant here was likewise a prisoner committed to the state prison at San Quentin. He made his escape from the road camp in Butte County and was subsequently apprehended at Salt Lake City. He was extradited and was returned to the prison at San Quentin. Thereafter he was tried and convicted in the Superior Court of Marin County on the charge of escape and from the final judgment of conviction he appeals.

While separate briefs have been filed herein, said briefs are almost identical with the briefs filed in the Richardson case. No new points are raised. For the reasons set forth in the opinion of People v. Richardson, Criminal number 1790, the judgment herein is affirmed.

Nourse, P. J., and Sturtevant, J., concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

32 P.2d 436, 138 Cal. App. 775, 1934 Cal. App. LEXIS 885, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-vincent-calctapp-1934.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack