People v. Villavincencio

165 A.D.2d 934, 561 N.Y.S.2d 315, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11305

This text of 165 A.D.2d 934 (People v. Villavincencio) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Villavincencio, 165 A.D.2d 934, 561 N.Y.S.2d 315, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11305 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Schenectady County (Harrigan, J.), rendered February 17, 1989, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of two counts of the crime of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second degree.

The only issue defendant raises on this appeal is that the sentence he received, two concurrent prison terms of four years to life, is harsh and excessive. Although defendant did not receive the minimum sentence allowed by statute, he also did not receive the maximum sentence (see, Penal Law § 70.00 [2] [a]; [3] [a] [ii]). Even more significant, defendant pleaded guilty knowing that he would receive the sentence ultimately imposed by County Court. Under such circumstances, we reject defendant’s claim that the sentence he bargained for is harsh and excessive (see, People v Neira, 130 AD2d 518, lv denied 70 NY2d 715; People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816, 817).

Judgment affirmed.

Mahoney, P. J., Weiss, Mikoll, Levine and Harvey, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Kazepis
101 A.D.2d 816 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
People v. Neira
130 A.D.2d 518 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
165 A.D.2d 934, 561 N.Y.S.2d 315, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11305, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-villavincencio-nyappdiv-1990.