People v. Villane
This text of 49 A.D.3d 517 (People v. Villane) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in upwardly departing from the defendant’s presumptive sex of[518]*518fender level based upon clear and convincing evidence of aggravating factors of a degree not taken into account by the risk assessment instrument and the guidelines (see People v Leibach, 39 AD3d 1093 [2007]; People v Agard, 35 AD3d 568 [2006]). The defendant’s remaining contentions need not be addressed in light of our determination (see People v Turner, 45 AD3d 747 [2007]) and, in any event, are without merit (see People v Johnson, 47 AD3d 140 [2007]; People v Lawless, 44 AD3d 738 [2007], lv denied 9 NY3d 816 [2007]). Miller, J.P., Covello, Eng and Chambers, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
49 A.D.3d 517, 851 N.Y.2d 880, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-villane-nyappdiv-2008.