People v. Villalona

91 A.D.3d 536, 936 N.Y.2d 547

This text of 91 A.D.3d 536 (People v. Villalona) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Villalona, 91 A.D.3d 536, 936 N.Y.2d 547 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

Regardless of whether defendant was eligible for resentencing, the record supports the court’s alternative finding that substantial justice dictated denial of the application. That determination was a proper exercise of the court’s discretion (see People v Gonzalez, 29 AD3d 400 [2006], lv denied 7 NY3d 867 [2006]). Shortly after being released from prison on a homicide conviction, defendant possessed a significant quantity of drugs under circumstances indicating that he was involved in large-scale drug trafficking. These factors outweighed defendant’s favorable record while incarcerated on the drug case (see e.g. People v Gumbs, 66 AD3d 558 [2009], lv dismissed 14 NY3d 771 [2010]). Concur — Tom, J.P, Catterson, DeGrasse, Richter and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Gonzalez
29 A.D.3d 400 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
91 A.D.3d 536, 936 N.Y.2d 547, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-villalona-nyappdiv-2012.