People v. Vigilante

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Vigilante

56 A.D.2d 667, 391 N.Y.S.2d 994, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10815

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 28, 1977

StatusPublished

This text of 56 A.D.2d 667 (People v. Vigilante) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Vigilante, 56 A.D.2d 667, 391 N.Y.S.2d 994, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10815 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered July 6, 1976, convicting Mm of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon a plea of guilty, and sentencing him to an indeterminate term of imprisonment with a maximum of five years. Judgment modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by reducing the sentence to a five-year period of probation. As so modified, judgment affirmed and case remitted to the Criminal Term to fix the terms and conditions of probation and for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (subd 5). The sentence was excessive to the extent indicated herein. Rabin, Acting P. J., Shapiro, Titone and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered July 6, 1976, convicting Mm of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon a plea of guilty, and sentencing him to an indeterminate term of imprisonment with a maximum of five years. Judgment modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by reducing the sentence to a five-year period of probation. As so modified, judgment affirmed and case remitted to the Criminal Term to fix the terms and conditions of probation and for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (subd 5). The sentence was excessive to the extent indicated herein. Rabin, Acting P. J., Shapiro, Titone and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

56 A.D.2d 667, 391 N.Y.S.2d 994, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10815, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-vigilante-nyappdiv-1977.