People v. Vidal

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Vidal

67 A.D.2d 934, 412 N.Y.S.2d 1016, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10704

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 5, 1979

StatusPublished

This text of 67 A.D.2d 934 (People v. Vidal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Vidal, 67 A.D.2d 934, 412 N.Y.S.2d 1016, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10704 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeal by defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the County Court, Suffolk County, imposed November 4, 1976, upon his conviction of manslaughter in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, the sentence being a term of imprisonment of 814 years to 25 years to be served consecutive to a previously imposed Federal sentence. Sentence modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by changing to concurrent the provision that it be served consecutive to the previously imposed Federal sentence. As so modified, sentence affirmed. The sentence was excessive to the extent indicated herein. Suozzi, J. P., Rabin, Gulotta and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal by defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the County Court, Suffolk County, imposed November 4, 1976, upon his conviction of manslaughter in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, the sentence being a term of imprisonment of 814 years to 25 years to be served consecutive to a previously imposed Federal sentence. Sentence modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by changing to concurrent the provision that it be served consecutive to the previously imposed Federal sentence. As so modified, sentence affirmed. The sentence was excessive to the extent indicated herein. Suozzi, J. P., Rabin, Gulotta and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

67 A.D.2d 934, 412 N.Y.S.2d 1016, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10704, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-vidal-nyappdiv-1979.