People v. Victor

2026 NY Slip Op 00803
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 11, 2026
DocketInd. No. 74218/22
StatusPublished

This text of 2026 NY Slip Op 00803 (People v. Victor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Victor, 2026 NY Slip Op 00803 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2026).

Opinion

People v Victor (2026 NY Slip Op 00803)
People v Victor
2026 NY Slip Op 00803
Decided on February 11, 2026
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on February 11, 2026 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
LARA J. GENOVESI, J.P.
WILLIAM G. FORD
CARL J. LANDICINO
SUSAN QUIRK, JJ.

2024-02952
(Ind. No. 74218/22)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Jose Victor, appellant.


Twyla Carter, New York, NY (Nicholas Pulakos of counsel), for appellant.

Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Leonard Joblove, Jordan Cerruti, and David Cao of counsel), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Raymond L. Rodriguez, J.), rendered March 20, 2024, convicting him of criminal possession of a firearm, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the record demonstrates that he knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived his right to appeal (see People v Thomas, 34 NY3d 545; People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248). The defendant's valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes appellate review of his challenge to the Supreme Court's denial of those branches of his omnibus motion which were to suppress physical evidence and his statements to law enforcement officials (see People v Cheristin, 239 AD3d 670, 671; People v Hightower-Castro, 219 AD3d 504, 505) and his contention that the sentence imposed was excessive (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d at 256).

GENOVESI, J.P., FORD, LANDICINO and QUIRK, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Darrell M. Joseph

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Lopez
844 N.E.2d 1145 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)
People v. Hightower-Castro
219 A.D.3d 504 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2023)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2026 NY Slip Op 00803, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-victor-nyappdiv-2026.