People v. Vicens

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Vicens

77 A.D.3d 1389, 908 N.Y.S.2d 381

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 1, 2010·Published

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Thomas M. Van Strydonck, J.), entered February 3, 2009. The order determined that defendant is a level two risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act following a redetermination hearing.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs. Present—Scudder, P.J., Centra, Peradotto, Sconiers and Pine, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Thomas M. Van Strydonck, J.), entered February 3, 2009. The order determined that defendant is a level two risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act following a redetermination hearing.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs. Present—Scudder, P.J., Centra, Peradotto, Sconiers and Pine, JJ.

People v. Vicens, 77 A.D.3d 1389, 908 N.Y.S.2d 381 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

77 A.D.3d 1389 (People v. Vicens) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.