People v. Vert

134 A.D. 790, 24 N.Y. Crim. 150, 119 N.Y.S. 859, 1909 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2986
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 10, 1909
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 134 A.D. 790 (People v. Vert) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Vert, 134 A.D. 790, 24 N.Y. Crim. 150, 119 N.Y.S. 859, 1909 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2986 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1909).

Opinion

Smith, P. J.:

The defendant was indicted for poisoning cattle under section 660 of the Penal Code. He was indicted by a grand jury drawn for a term of the Supreme Court in St. Lawrence county. The case was sent to the County Court. The defendant demurred to the indictment for lack of jurisdiction. The demurrer was sustained.

The case of People v. Knatt (156 N. Y. 302) seems to have settled two questions: First, that a crime committed under section 660 of the Penal Code is one triable exclusively in a Court of Special Sessions under section 56 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, unless the certificate provided for under section 57 of the Code of Criminal Procedure be made. It was conceded upon the trial that such a certificate was not made. It is further settled by the majority of the court in that case that the jurisdiction of the court could not be raised by a demurrer, but could only be raised by motion.

It is unnecessary for us to pass in any way upon the merits of this appeal. The district attorney does not claim that the grand jury had any jurisdiction to find this indictment. The defendant was, therefore, entitled to his discharge, and if we reverse this judgment and overrule this demurrer it would simply result in sending the prisoner back for his discharge upon motion. We are at a loss to understand how there is any practical question before us. The appeal, therefore, should be dismissed, without costs.

All concurred.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Ruttles
172 Misc. 306 (New York Supreme Court, 1939)
Defazio v. Oneida County Court
140 Misc. 487 (New York Supreme Court, 1931)
People v. Roberts
33 N.Y. Crim. 367 (New York County Courts, 1915)
People v. Gardner
28 N.Y. Crim. 407 (New York County Courts, 1912)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
134 A.D. 790, 24 N.Y. Crim. 150, 119 N.Y.S. 859, 1909 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2986, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-vert-nyappdiv-1909.