People v. Vernon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Vernon

5 A.D.3d 1094, 773 N.Y.S.2d 719, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3217

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 19, 2004

StatusPublished

This text of 5 A.D.3d 1094 (People v. Vernon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Vernon, 5 A.D.3d 1094, 773 N.Y.S.2d 719, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3217 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Russell E Buscaglia, A.J.), rendered June 21, 2001. The judgment convicted defendant, upon a jury verdict, of intimidating a victim or witness in the second degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him after a jury trial of intimidating a victim or witness in the second degree (Penal Law § 215.16 [1]). Defendant raises the identical contentions raised by his codefendant on his appeal (People v Boler, 4 AD3d 768 [ 2004]), and we therefore affirm the judgment for the reasons stated in our decision therein. Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Green, Hurlbutt, Scudder and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Russell E Buscaglia, A.J.), rendered June 21, 2001. The judgment convicted defendant, upon a jury verdict, of intimidating a victim or witness in the second degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him after a jury trial of intimidating a victim or witness in the second degree (Penal Law § 215.16 [1]). Defendant raises the identical contentions raised by his codefendant on his appeal (People v Boler, 4 AD3d 768 [ 2004]), and we therefore affirm the judgment for the reasons stated in our decision therein. Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Green, Hurlbutt, Scudder and Lawton, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

5 A.D.3d 1094, 773 N.Y.S.2d 719, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3217, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-vernon-nyappdiv-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack